Dutch journalist who first uncovered names of 'royal racists' says Omid Scobie's Endgame has been released in Holland with 'hundreds' of changes - as biographer is seen for the first time since admitting early drafts DID name them

The Dutch journalist who first uncovered the names of the alleged 'royal racists' said Omid Scobie's Endgame has been re-released in Holland with 'hundreds of changes'.

Rick Evers took to X to highlight the tweaks made to the explosive book, comparing the newly published version to the first edition - which has since been pulled from shelves in the Netherlands.

The book no longer names the two family members alleged to have voiced 'concerns' about Prince Archie's skin colour.  

The text has also been sanitised to be more respectful towards the Royal Family and tone down accusatory language towards Prince William.

Scobie, who had initially denied that he had revealed the names in the book, has now been seen for the first time since his controversial book reignited the 'racism' row between the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the royals.

Dressed in a casual flannel button down and corduroy trousers, Scobie was pictured quickly leaving Chateau Marmont, a celebrity hotspot in West Hollywood, on Friday as he entered a waiting car. 

It comes after the author seemingly blamed the publisher for the printing mishap, admitting that the firm was sent and 'early and uncleared text' of his book to work on with the understanding that the translation would be updated for a final version.

But in a statement given to MailOnline last week the publisher disputed this, calling him out by saying he was 'factually incorrect'.

In a series of tweets on Friday, Mr Evers highlighted how the new changes in the Dutch translation of Endgame.

On page 128 of the original book, it named King Charles III as one of the royals who questioned the colour of Harry and Meghan's son Archie, before he was born.

Before, according to Mr Evers, it said: 'But in those private letters an identity was revealed and confirmed - Charles.'

However, the new version now no longer mentions the Monarch, he points out, but rather states that 'strict British laws' prevent Scobie from revealing names.

He also says that in the previous edition, Prince William was referred to as appearing 'lazy', however now this has been changed to having a 'work-shy image'.

The Dutch royal reporter said that some places where Scobie wrote 'I' were changed to reference ABC News, and said that new sources had been added to the book.

The journalist also said the Dutch version of Endgame originally said Charles had 'questionable deals, suspicious links and his poor judgement'.

However this has been simplified and changed to 'questionable choices' in the new version, according to Evers, who posted screenshots on X.

In the pulled book, it stated that Scobie was 'almost hit' by William. But this has since been changed to 'William's moving car that I almost ran into'.

The new edition also said that the pair were 'both a little surprised'. However, the old book wondered whether the near miss was 'on purpose'.

The re-released Endgame now says: 'I gestured a "sorry," but his neutral look from the driver's seat gave little away as we both waited a long second.'

But the previous version had described William's look as 'cold', rather than 'neutral'.

Evers also said that there have been some alterations surrounding race and the history of slavery in the book.

The new Endgame asterisks the word n***a , but it was not censored in the previous edition. It has also changed the word 'slaves' to 'enslaved people'.

There have also been some minor changes when it comes to titles. The new version of Endgame now refers to Camilla as 'Queen Consort' rather than the Queen, and Catherine has been changed to Kate, according to Evers.

He also claims that changes to the text are 'clearing coming from the Sussex camp,' alleging that sources close to Harry and Meghan are 'quoted differently'. 

Evers's posts on X came as the Dutch publishers of Omid Scobie's book hit back at his claims that they were to blame for the names two royals being named as racist.

The author used a newspaper column to say that the publisher was sent one version of his book to work on with the understanding that the translation would be updated for a final version.

But in a statement given to MailOnline the publisher disputed this, calling him out by saying he was 'factually incorrect'

A spokesman for the publisher Xander Uitgevers said: 'Omid Scobie's explanation in his column in iNews about the Dutch editorial process of the Dutch edition of Endgame is factually incorrect and we do not recognize ourselves in his representation of the events.

'Xander Uitgevers is not allowed to say anything about the content, we therefore refer to the agent UTA.'

Scobie had initially denied that he had revealed the names of the two royals in his much criticised book.

One of the translators told MailOnline from her home in Arnhem that the names of the two royals – King Charles and the Princess of Wales – were already in the text she was asked to translate.

Scobie admitted for the first time on Friday in a newspaper column for the i that both names were in an early draft that he said had been written at 'lightening speed'.

He wrote: 'To be clear, the only publisher I worked directly with was the one covering the US and UK. 

'I spent almost two months with independent British barristers and in-house legal counsel to ensure that every detail in the finished book was legally watertight'.

He added: 'Unbeknownst to me at the time, early and uncleared text was provided to the Dutch publisher in order for them to start work on the translation, with the understanding that their translation would be updated to reflect the final version of the book I officially submitted'.

His statement, appearing to shift the blame on to the Haarlem-based publishing house, has now been called into question by its director Anke Roelen.

Copies of the Dutch version had to pulled from bookstores across Holland with an amended version going on sale on Friday.

It was pulled after it named Charles and Kate as the royals alleged to have asked what colour Prince Archie's skin might be. 

Mr Scobie said on Friday: 'To be clear, the only publisher I worked directly with was the one covering the US and UK. I spent almost two months with independent British barristers and in-house legal counsel to ensure that every detail in the finished book was legally watertight'.

He added: 'Unbeknownst to me at the time, early and uncleared text was provided to the Dutch publisher in order for them to start work on the translation, with the understanding that their translation would be updated to reflect the final version of the book I officially submitted'. 

The names of King Charles and the Princess of Wales only appeared in the Dutch version, with Mr Scobie swearing on his own life – and his family's – that it was not a publicity stunt to sell more books.

Neither Meghan nor Harry has so far spoken up in defence of the royals over highly damaging accusations of racism. 

In Friday's column for the newspaper, entitled 'Endgame backlash shows how unwilling we are to confront racism', Mr Scobie also called on King Charles to use his reign to confront the Royal Family's links to slavery.

He said: 'Shooing away opportunities to meaningfully explore the royal institution's historic links to slavery (and the impact its legacy has had on the country), or have serious conversations around the royal institution's failure to protect its only family member of colour, sends a clear message that the issues just don't matter'.

He added: 'Rather than properly address everything as part of a genuine attempt to modernise and better reflect the diverse country they serve, the Royal Family continue to sweep the issues, and more, under the rug'.

Mr Scobie's controversial new book sold just under 6,500 copies in Britain. 

Endgame, a follow-up to Scobie's 2020 book Finding Freedom, dropped to 215th on the Amazon bestseller list after just a week on the shelves.

It was widely pilloried even by normally sympathetic media outlets such as the New York Times, which described one chapter as 'like a press release cooked up by ChatGPT'.

Most of the reaction to the book has focused on its Dutch language edition, which included the names of the two family members accused by the Duchess of Sussex of 'unconscious bias'.

The book claimed Meghan had named the King as well as daughter-in-law Kate in letters she wrote to him on the issue.

Yet even this controversy has done little to boost its success, with Nielsen putting British sales figures for the first five days at 6,448.

By contrast, Scobie's first book on the Sussexes, Finding Freedom, sold 31,000 in its first five days while Harry's autobiography Spare sold 467,183 – making it the fastest selling non-fiction book since records began in 1998.

The book is now in the table behind activity book Things To Do While You Poo On The Loo and children's titles such as Dormouse Has a Cold, the Beano annual, Diary of a Wimpy Kid and Stick Man.

Neither Harry nor Meghan commented publicly on the race row but a source close to the Duchess of Sussex said 'it was not leaked to Mr Scobie by anyone in her camp'.

Meghan's Hollywood relaunch is 'not going to plan' and may already have been scuppered because the backlash sparked by Mr Scobie's book could make her 'too hot to handle', experts told MailOnline yesterday.

The duchess recently signed with William Morris Endeavor (WME) mega-agent Ari Emanuel whose clients include Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson, tennis star Serena Williams, among other A-Listers.

Brand and culture expert Nick Ede told MailOnline that Endgame could be as dangerous for her career as Spare – her husband's memoir – was for Prince Harry, claiming her representatives in LA will be worried she has 'tarnished her reputation and could potentially damage the reputation of her agency'.

Mr Ede believes Meghan could soon become 'too hot to handle' after the King and Kate were named as being at the centre of the race row allegations in a Dutch version of the book. 

He also claimed that the silence from the Sussexes since the book came out makes Meghan look 'guilty by association', despite vehement claims by Mr Scobie, who is an ally of the actress, and her friends that she had nothing to do with the book.

Mr Ede said: 'The book written by Omid Scobie is potentially a career incendiary device for Meghan. Just as Harry's own goal of a book has proved for him, the new book by Scobie unfortunately has fuelled a fire which many had thought would die down.

'The issue for a huge Hollywood agent is that they will find it hard to navigate the career of Meghan fearing that more will come out over time and that, with court cases looming from her sister and potentially her father, she has tarnished her reputation and could potentially damage the reputation of her agency'.

He added: 'Meghan in the right hands is a superpower – the world's most famous woman – and on paper she could make millions for herself and for whomever represents her. 

'But she's proving to be too hot to handle and, even though she hasn't said anything about the book, she's guilty by association and this is damaging for her and others as she plots her next career move'.

PR guru Mark Borkowski told MailOnline that Meghan's post-Spare relaunch 'is clearly not going to plan'.

MailOnline approached WME for comment.

The New York Post has reported claims that the publisher has been left 'horrified' about the potential damage Mr Scobie's book may have done to the Sussexes' rebrand.

An insider also told the Daily Mirror that WME are 'exasperated' by the 'never-ending scandal' around the Sussexes.