Pentagon slashes weapons programs to stay under debt deal

Compared with DOD’s projected levels for fiscal 2025 outlined in its last budget submission, the $850 billion total amounts to a $10 billion cut, or more than 1 percent of the department’s budget.

One percent may sound small in the context of an almost trillion-dollar annual budget. But officials note that because pay raises for troops and other personnel bills are set in stone, the bulk of the cuts will need to come from weapons modernization programs.

“It’s horrific frankly, the impact that’s going to have,” Nathan Diller, a former House Appropriations Defense subcommittee staffer and retired Air Force colonel, referring to the cut coupled with a potential year-long continuing resolution. He spoke Wednesday at an Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International conference.

A DOD spokesperson declined to comment.

Each of the military services is planning cuts to major weapons programs in order to comply with the caps. The Navy, for example, has been discussing plans to push back funding for its next nuclear-powered submarine, according to a congressional staffer and an industry official.

The Navy has funded two Virginia-class submarines a year since 2011, after building one a year beginning in 1997, at a cost of over $4 billion per boat. Under the proposal being floated, the Navy would request only one submarine for fiscal 2025, according to the staffer and industry official. USNI News first reported the Virginia-class sub proposal.

A Navy spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

Meanwhile, the Army recently announced a massive overhaul of its aviation programs, including shelving major helicopter and drone projects and putting that money toward aircraft the Army believes are most necessary on the modern battlefield.

The revamp includes canceling the long-planned replacement for the OH-58 Kiowa scout helicopter, known as the Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft; ending a service-life upgrade program for the Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk; delaying production of the Improved Turbine Engine, which was meant to power the new reconnaissance helicopter, AH-64 Apaches and Black Hawks; and retiring its fleet of AAI RQ-7 Shadow and AeroVironment RQ-11 Raven drones.

And the Air Force is expected to cut its purchases of the F-35 fighter jet by 18 percent this year, according to a third congressional staffer, on top of a major structural shakeup that would consolidate some of its major three-and four-star commands. The F-35 news was first reported by Reuters.

Air Force leaders said the reorganization will not require additional funding. Instead, the service plans to submit requests to move money from other accounts if needed. But submitting such requests “isn’t the answer” because that means the service is shifting funding from what appropriators told them to buy, a former congressional aide said.

The debt ceiling compromise, known as the Fiscal Responsibility Act, was agreed to last year by Biden and Capitol Hill Republicans to constrain discretionary spending in exchange for an increase in the federal borrowing limit to avoid a catastrophic default. House Republicans pushed to slash spending to rein in the deficit, and the final deal caps both defense and domestic spending for two years.

The deal caps national defense spending — which includes the Pentagon, nuclear weapons programs under the Energy Department and other national security programs — at $886 billion this year. For fiscal 2025, the second year of the deal, the cap is $895 billion, just a 1 percent increase.

The spending caps forced DOD to make tough choices about its funding priorities, said one of the U.S. officials.

The department has “must-pay bills for personnel and taking care of people,” the official said, adding that “quality of life and readiness have to be priorities.”

“So when you’re capped over the next few years, investments in modernization will naturally take a hit, or at least be pushed right,” the official said.

The tightly constrained Pentagon topline is complicated by continued inflation, a 5.2 percent troop pay raise and other expenses such as the unexpectedly heavy pace of operations in the Middle East and Red Sea — forcing tough choices on major Pentagon programs.

“Every administration has gone through this kind of situation when the numbers are lower than what they had originally planned,” Arnold Punaro, a former staff director for the Senate Armed Services Committee, said of the budget crunch. “Every administration, when they get into budget cut drills, there’s a kind of normal pattern that they follow.”

“None of this should surprise us based on the fact that the Pentagon got stuck with a debt deal they didn’t want,” Punaro said.

Todd Harrison, a budget expert at the American Enterprise Institute, noted that the debt deal does not specifically require DOD to submit a budget request under the caps; rather it restricts what Congress can appropriate. The administration’s decision to submit a proposal under the caps sends a message that “they don’t need more money for defense, they are happy with the caps,” he said.

“The Biden administration is not that enthusiastic about spending more on defense,” Harrison added, arguing that DOD is “cutting things that they wanted to cut for a while, and this is giving them some top cover to do so.”

Lawmakers still haven’t locked in a permanent spending bill for the current year, leaving federal funding on autopilot for nearly the first half of fiscal 2024. House and Senate appropriators face two early March deadlines to avoid federal agencies shutting down, and Pentagon funding would lapse if a full-year deal or another stopgap doesn’t pass by March 8.

An even costlier deadline is looming in just over a month for the Pentagon and other departments. Federal agencies will be hit with a mandatory 1 percent cut under the debt limit law if full-year funding for the entire government isn’t enacted by the end of April.

The Pentagon budget will be part of the White House’s government-wide request expected in early March. Once that happens, the Pentagon brass will have to face lawmakers and defend their program cuts to meet the tight constraints of the debt deal.

“This is going to be an interesting budget to watch them try to explain,” Harrison said.