Wharton board calls on the president of the University of Pennsylvania to resign: Liz Magill's refusal before Congress to condemn calls for the genocide of Jews revealed the 'dangerous and toxic culture' in the college

The Wharton board of advisors has called for the president of the University of Pennsylvania to resign, after she refused to say that calling for the genocide of Jews was hate speech.

Liz Magill on Tuesday testified in Congress, along with the presidents of Harvard and MIT, and equivocated on whether calls for genocide were hate speech.

On Wednesday she attempted to clarify her comments, but the damage was done: a wealthy alumnus withdrew a $100 million donation, and her remarks were roundly condemned by the ADL, the White House and politicians across the board.

On Thursday, the board of Wharton - the world's first business school, founded in 1881 at the University of Pennsylvania - said Magill needed to resign.

They said leadership of the university needed to change 'with immediate effect'.

The board, in a letter first obtained by The Daily Pennsylvanian, describes their concern about 'dangerous and toxic culture' at Penn that they said the University leadership has allowed to exist. 

The letter adds that the University leadership 'does not share the values of our Board.' 

The board, in their letter, said they have held eight sessions since November 16, and drafted a set of resolutions regarding campus conduct and leadership.

The 29 business titans that comprise the board - among them the CEO of American Express' U.S. banking operation; the CEO of real estate giant Related Companies, the largest landlord in New York City; and the former chair of Johnson & Johnson - said they felt their proposals were ignored.

One of the resolutions they proposed was that Wharton community members will not celebrate murder or genocide, use hate speech, or use language that threatens the physical safety of others. The resolution also said that those who violate these standards will 'be subject to immediate discipline.' 

Magill on Tuesday was asked a 'yes or no' question on whether calls for the genocide of Jews counted as hate speech, and repeatedly said it depended on the context.

Her mealy-mouthed answer - and the equally feeble response from the other two - sparked fury, with one donor withdrawing a $100 million grant and many calling for Magill to resign. 

On Wednesday, Magill published a groveling video statement attempting to explain her failure to condemn calls for the genocide of Jewish people on campuses.

She said she was not 'focused' on the issue, and said she wanted to 'be clear' that calls for genocide were 'evil, plain and simple' - although she said the blame lay with her university's policies and the constitution, rather than with her.

Magill said: 'There was a moment during yesterday's Congressional hearing on antisemitism when I was asked if a call for the genocide of Jewish people on our campus would violate our policies.

'In that moment, I was focused on our university's long-standing policies - aligned with the U.S. Constitution - which say that speech alone is not punishable.

'I was not focused on, but I should have been, the irrefutable fact that a call for genocide of Jewish people is a call for some of the most terrible violence human beings can perpetrate. It's evil, plain and simple.'

Magill said she hoped to draw a line in the sand, and clarify her position. 

'I want to be clear: a call for genocide of Jewish people is threatening, deeply so,' she said.

'It is intentionally meant to terrify a people who have been subjected to pogroms and hatred for centuries, and were the victims of mass genocide in the Holocaust.

'In my view it would be harassment or intimidation.'

But, Magill said, it was not officially classed as harassment - a policy she said was outdated and needed review.

Magill pledged to work to update the existing rules. 

'For decades under multiple Penn presidents and consistent with most universities, Penn's policies have been guided by the Constitution and the law,' she said.

'In today's world, where we are seeing signs of hate proliferating across our campus and our world in a way not seen in years, these policies need to be clarified and evaluated.

'Penn must initiate a serious and careful look at our policies.'

She concluded that she was 'committed to a safe, secure and supportive environment so all members of our community can thrive. We can, and we will, get it right.'

Harvard also attempted to limit the damage from remarks by their president, Claudine Gay.

Gay, asked the same question, also equivocated.

On Wednesday, the university published a statement from Gay on X.

'There are some who have confused a right to free expression with the idea that Harvard will condone calls for violence against Jewish students,' she said. 

'Let me be clear: Calls for violence or genocide against the Jewish community, or any religious or ethnic group are vile, they have no place at Harvard, and those who threaten our Jewish students will be held to account.' 

All three said on Tuesday calling for the genocide of Jews was anti-Semitic hate speech but didn't necessarily break their school rules. 

They would act, they said, if such hate speech crossed over into 'conduct'. 

An incredulous Elise Stefanik asked: 'Conduct being committing genocide?'

Billionaire hedge funder Bill Ackman - who gave $26million to Harvard in 2014 - is now calling for the resignation of all three women. Elon Musk agreed that it is time for their departure, and said the hearing crystalizes their liberal bias. 

Harvard Hillel, the school's leading Jewish organization, said it was 'appalled by the need to state the obvious'. 

The Harvard Alumni Association and the school's Board of Overseers are yet to address Gay's remarks. 

The Hillel said: 'President Gay's refusal to draw a line around threatening antisemitic speech as a violation of Harvard's policies is profoundly shocking given explicit provisions within the conduct code prohibiting this kind of bullying and harassment. 

'We are appalled by the need to state the obvious: A call for genocide against Jews is always a hateful incitement of violence. 

'President Gay's failure to properly condemn this speech calls into question her ability to protect Jewish students on Harvard's campus.

'President Gay's testimony fails to reassure us that the University is seriously concerned about the anti-Semitic rhetoric pervasive on campus. 

'We call on President Gay to take action against those using threatening speech that violates our community standards.'

The three universities have been roiled by a series of pro-Palestine marches on their campuses in the wake of the October 7 attack, with students blaming Israel for Hamas' terrorist outrage, and saying the country deserved it.

Some academics have expressed rabidly anti-Israel opinions, and threats have been made against Jewish students on campus.

All three presidents have admitted they were slow to distance themselves from student groups justifying the October 7 massacres.

But they insisted that they wanted to preserve an environment of free speech - and refused, to Stefanik's fury, to give a 'yes or no' answer to questions about condemning certain rhetoric.

'I am asking, specifically calling for the genocide of Jews, does that constitute bullying or harassment?' asked Stefanik.

Gay told her that it depended on the context.

Stefanik responded that it was 'the easiest question', then answered for them: 'The answer is yes.'

Stefanik pressed Gay over whether Harvard would punish students or applicants who advocate for the murder of Jews.

Gay replied: 'That type of hateful, reckless, offensive speech is personally abhorrent to me.'

She said the university had 'robust policies' that hold individuals accountable when speech crosses into conduct, such as bullying, harassment or intimidation.

'We embrace a commitment to free expression and give a wide berth to free expression even to views that are objectionable, outrageous and offensive,' Gay said.

At one point, Gay said: 'I've sought to confront hate while preserving free expression. This is difficult work, and I know that I have not always gotten it right.'

But Stefanik said their answers were 'unacceptable', and demanded all three resign.

Ackman said he was horrified by the testimony.

'This could be the most extraordinary testimony ever elicited in the Congress, certainly on the topic of genocide,' he wrote on X.

'The presidents' answers reflect the profound educational, moral and ethical failures that pervade certain of our elite educational institutions due in large part to their failed leadership.'

He said that the trio's answers would be unacceptable in the business world.

'If a CEO of one of our companies gave a similar answer, he or she would be toast within the hour,' he said.

'Why has antisemitism exploded on campus and around the world?

'Because of leaders like Presidents Gay, Magill and Kornbluth who believe genocide depends on the context.

'To think that these are the leaders of Ivy League institutions that are charged with the responsibility to educate our best and brightest.'

His criticism of Gay comes just days after the billionaire posted an open letter on X accusing Harvard of discriminating against 'straight white men' and railing against the university's equity and inclusion efforts. 

The Jewish student organization, Harvard Hillel, said that Gay's 'refusal' to 'draw a line' on threatening antisemitic speech is 'profoundly shocking.'

Harvard Hillel said that they questioned the president's 'ability to protect Jewish students on Harvard's campus.'

'We are appalled by the need to state the obvious: A call for genocide against Jews is always a hateful incitement of violence. President Gay's failure to properly condemn this speech calls into question her ability to protect Jewish students on Harvard's campus,' the Harvard Hillel said.

'Chants to 'globalize the intifada,' an endorsement of violent terrorist attacks against Jewish and Israeli civilians, and 'from the river to the sea,' an eliminationist slogan intended to deprive Jews of their right to self-determination in Israel, have become tragically routine at Harvard.'

Magill, the UPenn president, was questioned over her school's participation in a 'Palestine Writes Festival' in September.

A complaint filed with the Education Department against Penn cites the festival as a catalyst for antisemitic incidents on campus. Speakers included several with a history of making antisemitic remarks, such as Pink Floyd's Roger Waters.

She said antisemitic speech at the event was 'abhorrent' to her and that the institution put safety precautions into place.

'Why in the world would you host someone like that on your campus?' asked Jim Banks, a Republican congressman for Indiana.

'Antisemitism has no place at Penn,' Magill began to answer.

Banks interrupted, and asked: 'Why did you invite Roger Waters?'

OnShe concluded: 'I think canceling that conference would have been very inconsistent with academic freedom and free expression despite the fact that the views of some of the people who came to that conference I find very, very objectionable because of their antisemitism.'